| Attention: Selection over Time |
1 |
Shapiro, Martin, Arend, Johnston, & Klein |
The contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) predicts the attentional blink |
| 2 |
MacLean, Stokes, Gicante, & Arnell |
The "working" component of working memory predicts AB magnitude |
| 3 |
Dale, Young, & Arnell |
That's my name, don't wear it out: Attentional blink and the cocktail party effect |
| 4 |
Kawahara |
When do additional distractors reduce and increase the attentional blink? |
| 5 |
Jefferies & Di Lollo |
Shrinking and shifting: Two alternative task-dependent modes of attentional control |
| 6 |
Hanus, Vul, & Kanwisher |
Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink |
| 7 |
Dux & Marois |
Individual differences in distractor priming during the attentional blink: Distractor inhibition gives rise to awareness |
| 8 |
Harris, Benito, & Dux |
Object processing in the absence of attention |
| 9 |
Chua |
Noise Overlay on the RSVP stream reduces the AB |
| 10 |
Sy & Giesbrecht |
Inter-trial switches in perceptual load modulate semantic processing during the attentional blink |
| 11 |
Elliott & Giesbrecht |
Rapid reconfiguration reduces the attentional blink |
| 12 |
Reiss, Hoffman, Heyward, Doran, & Most |
ERP Evidence for temporary loss of control during the attentional blink |
| 13 |
Oriet & Corbett |
Evidence for rapid extraction of average size in RSVP displays of circles |
| 14 |
Bridge, Choo, & Chiao |
Can race enhance perceptual awareness? Evidence from the attentional blink paradigm |
| 15 |
Trick, Brandigampola, & Enns |
Does the prolonged attentional blink to emotional stimuli affect driving performance? |
| Motion: Integration, Flow, and Depth |
16 |
Harvey, Cowey, & Braddick |
Similar processing for detection and position discrimination of expanding, contracting and rotating motion flow patterns in random dot kinematograms, shown by adaptation and TMS |
| 17 |
Wattam-Bell, Birtles, Li, Lin, Braddick, & Atkinson |
Coherence dependence of high-density visual evoked potentials to global form and motion displays |
| 18 |
Allard & Faubert |
Common first- and second-order motion processing at high temporal frequencies |
| 19 |
Liu & Sperling |
The perceived motion direction of fast-moving Type-II plaids |
| 20 |
Rider, Johnston, & McOwan |
Motion integration fields are dynamically elongated in the direction of motion |
| 21 |
Aaen-Stockdale & Hess |
Spatial scale invariance of the amblyopic global motion deficit |
| 22 |
Gillespie, Braunstein, & Andersen |
The perception of path curvature: Effects of projected velocity and projected size |
| 23 |
Takemura & Murakami |
Motion detection sensitivity enhanced by induced motion |
| 24 |
Clarke & Rainville |
Motion grouping/segmentation via velocity gradients |
| 25 |
Gomi & Nishida |
Visual motion interaction between central and peripheral visual fields for the manual following response |
| 26 |
Gilmore, Mattes, & Christensen |
Stability of SSVEP responses to optic flow |
| 27 |
Lew & Dyre |
Linear sub-space modeling responses to transparent motions comprised of radial dot flows |
| 28 |
Rokers, Cormack, & Huk |
Neural circuits underlying the perception of 3D motion |
| 29 |
Lee & Grzywacz |
Failure of decomposition of translation and expansion/rotation in optic-flow perception |
| 30 |
Alvarez, Hoffman, & Banks |
When are trajectories for motion-in-depth stimuli perceived accurately? |
| 31 |
Lee, Yuille, & Lu |
Superior perception of circular/radial than translational motion cannot be explained by generic priors |
| 32 |
Billino, Braun, Bremmer, & Gegenfurtner |
Effects of focal brain lesions on perception of different motion types |
| Object Perception: Neural Mechanisms |
33 |
Swisher, Brady, & Tong |
Visual denoising of object images along the ventral pathway |
| 34 |
Kim, Lescroart, Hayworth, & Biederman |
The release from adaptation in LOC from viewing a sequence of two different objects: An effect of shape or semantics? |
| 35 |
Hayworth, Lescroart, & Biederman |
Explicit relation coding in the Lateral Occipital Complex |
| 36 |
O'Brien, Rutherford, & Raymond |
Can value learning modulate low-level visual object recognition? An ERP study |
| 37 |
Chen & Haynes |
Invariant decoding of object categories from V1 and LOC across different colors, sizes and speeds |
| 38 |
Williams, Baker, Op de Beeck, Dang, Triantafyllou, & Kanwisher |
Location-invariant object information in foveal retinotopic cortex |
| 39 |
Vuong & Schultz |
Dynamic objects are more than the sum of their views: Behavioural and neural signatures of depth rotation in object recognition |
| 40 |
Drucker & Aguirre |
Integral versus separable perceptual dimensional pairs are reflected in conjoint versus independent neural populations |
| 41 |
Wu & Zhang |
Dissociate binding processing and object representation – a study combining EEG and fMRI |
| 42 |
Freeman, Donner, & Heeger |
Inter-area correlations in the human ventral visual pathway reflect feature integration |
| 43 |
Tan, Serre, Kreiman, & Poggio |
Implicit coding of location, scale and configural information in feedforward hierarchical models of the visual cortex |
| 44 |
Op de Beeck, Brants, Baeck, & Wagemans |
Does perceived shape underlie the category selectivity in human occipitotemporal cortex for faces, body parts, and buildings? |
| 45 |
Remus, Davidenko, Hu, Glover, & Grill-Spector |
Reliability of object- and face-selective activations measured with high-resolution fMRI |
| 46 |
Bao, Yue, & Tjan |
BOLD signal response functions for object and face processing in noise |
| Perception and Action: Hand Movements |
47 |
Byrne, Pallan, Yan, & Crawford |
Integration of object-centered and viewer-centered visual information in an open-loop pointing task |
| 48 |
Hu & Knill |
Visual feedback control of pointing movements in depth |
| 49 |
Lau, Roy, & Desmarais |
Effects of experience and amount of visual feedback when pointing to visible and remembered targets |
| 50 |
Rossit, Muir, Reeves, Duncan, Livingstone, Jackson, Castle, & Harvey |
Non-lateralized impairments in anti- but not pro-pointing in patients with hemispatial neglect |
| 51 |
Striemer, Blangero, Rossetti, Pisella, & Danckert |
Attention for action? Examining the link between attention and visuomotor control deficits in a patient with optic ataxia |
| 52 |
Brown, Culham, Kroliczak, & Goodale |
Improved blindsight near the hand is associated with increased fMRI activation in the superior parietal-occipital cortex |
| 53 |
Giese, Fleischer, & Casile |
Neural model for the visual recognition of hand actions |
| 54 |
Kwon & Shelton |
Intermittent feedback model of goal directed forearm movement |
| 55 |
Tremblay & Luis |
The use of visual information during a visual saccade for the control of a goal-directed upper limb movement |
| 56 |
Collins, Röder, & Schicke |
Movement intention versus motor preparation in the orientation of visuo-spatial attention: The case of tool use |
| 57 |
Killingsworth & Levin |
Motion interference effects while performing and viewing actions with hand-held objects |
| 58 |
Binsted, Brownell, & Heath |
It's all a matter of mass: Both the eye and hand know it |
| 59 |
Siegel, Budge, Gill, & Henriques |
Why does intermanual transfer occur? |
| 60 |
Buckingham, Binsted, & Carey |
Bimanual coupling in left and right space: which hand is yoked to which? |
| 61 |
Richters, Gabree, & Eskew |
Hand-eye correlation: Sensorimotor learning of movement/color pairs |
| 62 |
Blavier & Nyssen |
The impact of expertise on the processing of 2D and 3D images: The case of minimal invasive surgery |
| Central Pathways |
63 |
Amano, Wandell, & Dumoulin |
The visual field maps in the human MT+ complex |
| 64 |
Kuriki, Ashida, Murakami, & Kitaoka |
Functional brain imaging of the 'Rotating Snakes' illusion |
| 65 |
Smith & Wall |
Human brain regions that are responsive to optic flow only when the flow is consistent with egomotion |
| 66 |
Shim, Jiang, & Kanwisher |
Types and tokens in the ventral visual pathway: The neural representation of multiple visual objects |
| 67 |
Tamietto, Cauda, Latini Corazzini, Savazzi, Marzi, Goebel, Weiskrantz, & de Gelder |
Collicular vision guides non-conscious behavior |
| 68 |
Sireteanu, Oertel, Mohr, Haenschel, Linden, Maurer, Singer, & Schwarz |
Graphical illustration and functional neuroimaging of visual hallucinations during prolonged blindfolding: A comparison to visual imagery |
| Perceptual Organization 1 |
69 |
Ing & Geisler |
Patch pair statistics for leaf segmentation |
| 70 |
Ostrovsky, Leonova, & Sinha |
Binding the pieces: Efficacies of grouping cues |
| 71 |
Oliva & Brady |
Perceptual organization across spatial scales in natural images: Seeing more high spatial frequency than meet the eyes |
| 72 |
May & Hess |
Testing filter-overlap models of contour integration |
| 73 |
Mueller, Do, & Leopold |
Independent measures of adaptation and aftereffect |
| 74 |
Maloney & Mamassian |
The visual system uses different estimators for different distributions in a novel task even without feedback or the possibility of learning |
| 3D Perception and Image Statistics |
75 |
Backus |
The subjective reliability of a newly recruited visual cue is similar whether or not a long-trusted cue is also present in the stimulus |
| 76 |
Fleming, Li, & Adelson |
Image statistics for 3D shape estimation |
| 77 |
Girshick, Burge, Erlikhman, & Banks |
Prior expectations in slant perception: Has the visual system internalized natural scene geometry? |
| 78 |
Knill |
Learning shape-specific Bayesian priors for depth perception |
| 79 |
Todd, Christensen, & Guckes |
Nonlinear biases in the perception of 3D slant from texture |
| 80 |
Burge, Held, & Banks |
Blur and accommodation are metric depth cues |
| 81 |
Berryhill, Aguirre, & Olson |
Superior occipital regions track perceived viewing distance in two dimensional images |
| Object: Neural Mechanisms |
82 |
Sayres & Grill-Spector |
Retinal position and object category effects in human lateral occipital cortex |
| 83 |
Lescroart, Hayworth, & Biederman |
How translation invariant are object representations in the human posterior fusiform gyrus? |
| 84 |
Carlson, Hogendoorn, Fonteijn, & Verstraten |
Orthogonal representations of object category and location in object selective cortex |
| 85 |
Rajimehr, Devaney, Young, Postelnicu, & Tootell |
The 'Parahippocampal Place Area' responds selectively to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys |
| 86 |
Gorlin, Sharma, Sugihara, Sur, & Sinha |
Imaging prior information in the visual system |
| 87 |
Wong & Gauthier |
Neural correlates of music reading expertise |
| 88 |
Kriegeskorte, Simmons, Bellgowan, & Baker |
Circular inference in neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping |
| Binocular Mechanisms 1 |
89 |
Mamassian |
Depth, but not surface orientation, from binocular disparities |
| 90 |
Fantoni & Gerbino |
The orientation disparity field accounts for a slant by tilt anisotropy |
| 91 |
Farell & Julian |
Orientation difference, spatial separation, intervening stimuli: What degrades stereoacuity and what doesn't |
| 92 |
Stroyan |
Computation of the geometric inputs to depth perception |
| 93 |
Harris, Chopin, & Zeiner |
Individual differences in depth perception: are biases correlated with eye position? |
| 94 |
Ni & Andersen |
Propagation of depth from temporal inter-ocular unmatched features and binocular information |
| 95 |
Ishii, Yamashita, & Tang |
Binocular disparity as a cue to perceive direction |
| 96 |
Chen, Lu, Tanigawa, & Roe |
Stereo matching problem is resolved at population level in the early stage of extrastriate visual cortex |
| 97 |
Jurcoane, Mitsieva, Choubey, Muckli, & Sireteanu |
Interocular transfer of fMRI adaptation in stereodeficient observers |
| 98 |
Shigemasu, Miyawaki, Kamitani, & Kitazaki |
Decoding depth order and three-dimensional shape perception from human cortical activity of dorsal and ventral areas |
| 99 |
Giaschi, MacKenzie, Boden, Solski, & Wilcox |
The development of coarse stereopsis in school aged children |
| Eye Movements, Search and Attention |
100 |
Atapattu & Durgin |
Saccadic inhibition during information accrual in a visual search task |
| 101 |
Khan, Takahashi, Heinen, & McPeek |
The spatial extent of attention for saccades: Attentional facilitation compared to inhibition of return in humans and monkeys |
| 102 |
Adolph, Franchak, Badaly, Smith, & Babcock |
Head-mounted eye-tracking with children: Visual guidance of motor action |
| 103 |
Fazl & Mingolla |
Predicting eye movement trajectories in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task with free viewing |
| 104 |
Hafed & Krauzlis |
How inactivation of the superior colliculus can cause a constant eye position offset during object tracking |
| 105 |
Smith, Tsai, Wong, Brooks, & Peterson |
More than meets the eye: Investigating expert and novice differences in action video games |
| 106 |
Najemnik & Geisler |
Optimal continuous-time control of eye movements during visual search |
| 107 |
Myers & Gray |
Scan pattern adaptations to repeated visual search |
| 108 |
Mennie & Underwood |
Memory for objects and locations in visual search |
| 109 |
Montagnini & Castet |
Presaccadic deployment of attention: what is the trigger? |
| 110 |
Raj, Bovik, & Cormack |
Low-level fixation search in natural scenes by optimal extraction of texture-contrast information |
| 111 |
McKinney, Chajka, & Hayhoe |
Pro-active gaze control in squash |
| 112 |
Wyatte & Busey |
Low and high level changes in eye gaze behavior as a result of expertise |
| 113 |
Jovancevic, Sullivan, & Hayhoe |
Avoiding collisions in real and virtual environments |
| 114 |
Masciocchi, Mihalas, Parkhurst, & Niebur |
Interesting locations in natural scenes draw eye movements |
| 115 |
Logan, Zbrodoff, & Li |
Do the eyes count? The role of eye movements in visual enumeration |
| 116 |
Mayer & Vuong |
Biological motion in natural scenes captures eye movements |
| 117 |
Holm, Eriksson, & Andersson |
Looking as if you know: Eye guidance preceding object recognition |
| 118 |
Dodd, Van Der Stigchel, Hollingworth, & Kingstone |
Examining scanpaths and inhibition of return as a function of task instruction during scene viewing |
| 119 |
Born & Kerzel |
Stimulus contrast and the remote distractor effect: differential effects for foveal and peripheral distractors |
| 120 |
Van der Stigchel |
Oculomotor competition when working memory is occupied |
| Motion: Higher Mechanisms and Illusions |
121 |
Takeuchi & De Valois |
Feature-tracking mechanism dominates motion perception as the retinal illuminance decreases |
| 122 |
Giora & Gori |
Visual competition between ambiguous and unambiguous motion signals in grating patterns |
| 123 |
Kawachi, Grove, Sakurai, & Gyoba |
Two streams make a bounce: Induced motion reversal by crossing the trajectories of two motion sequences |
| 124 |
Inokuma & Sato |
Induced motion with chromatic stimuli |
| 125 |
Seno & Sato |
Vection induction is determined by the world coordinate |
| 126 |
Rushton, Sumner, & Singh |
The role of hMST in the perception of object movement during self-movement |
| 127 |
Maffei, Macaluso, Orban, & Lacquaniti |
The internal model of visual gravity contributes to interception of real and apparent motion as revealed by fMRI |
| 128 |
Pizlo, Kim, Talavage, Pizlo, & Steinman |
Neural substrate of the perception of phi (pure) movement |
| 129 |
Hayashi & Kawano |
Paradoxical motion perception observed through contrast-alternating multiple-slit-viewing |
| 130 |
Paymer, Caplovitz, & Tse |
Stimulus factors that influence the perceived direction of tilt-induced motion |
| 131 |
Yazdanbakhsh & Gori |
Why does rotating tilted lines Illusion rotate? |
| 132 |
Gori, Galmonte, & Agostini |
Can depth information affect the Enigma Illusion? |
| 133 |
Zenz & Cai |
The effect of metacontrast masking on the Fröhlich effect |
| Attention: Selection and Modulation 1 |
134 |
Prinzmetal & Ha |
A taxonomy of visual attention |
| 135 |
Guzman, Palafox, Grabowecky, & Suzuki |
A visual redundant-signal effect strongly depends on attention even for probability summation |
| 136 |
Puri, Whitney, & Ranganath |
Facilitatory effects of expectation on object discrimination |
| 137 |
Al-Aidroos, Ho, & Pratt |
Attentional control settings affect attention but not perception: A study of gaze cues and pupilometry |
| 138 |
Yigit, Palmer, & Moore |
Partially valid cueing and spatial filtering reveal different kinds of selection |
| 139 |
Park, Fuller, & Carrasco |
Cue salience modulates the effects of exogenous attention on apparent contrast |
| 140 |
Matthews |
Bilateral superiority in detecting gabor targets among gabor distracters |
| 141 |
Ghorashi, Jefferies, & Di Lollo |
Expansion and contraction of the attentional focus is influenced by top-down factors |
| 142 |
Fuller & Carrasco |
Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: The case of the line motion illusion |
| 143 |
Flevaris, Bentin, & Robertson |
Attention to hierarchical level influences spatial frequency processing |
| 144 |
Abrams, Liu, & Carrasco |
Endogenous, sustained attention alters contrast appearance |
| 145 |
Shin & Chong |
Spatial attention to an invisible adaptor can increase the magnitude of adaptation |
| 146 |
Shimozaki |
The behavioural temporal dynamics of attention with multiple uncued locations |
| 147 |
Roggeveen, Jefferies, Sekuler, Bennett, & DiLollo |
The creaky attentional gate: Temporal changes in the spatial extent of attention in elderly and young observers |
| Faces: Inversion and Viewpoint Effects |
148 |
Tien, Lee, Tsai, & Hsu |
The inversion effect of Chinese character |
| 149 |
Nagai, Kazai, Bennett, Katayose, Yagi, Rutherford, & Sekuler |
The influence of eye and mouth position on judgments of face orientation |
| 150 |
Susilo, McKone, & Edwards |
Face adaptation aftereffects reveal norm-based coding for upright and inverted face shape |
| 151 |
Goffaux |
Face discrimination at various phase orientations |
| 152 |
Shannon, Jiang, & He |
Upright face advantage in visual information processing under interocular suppression only available for the low spatial frequency pathway |
| 153 |
Willenbockel, Fiset, Chauvin, Blais, Arguin, Tanaka, Bub, & Gosselin |
The face inversion effect is nothing "spatial" |
| 154 |
Pallett & MacLeod |
Face shape discrimination is insensitive to inversion |
| 155 |
Lee, Weiss, Haist, & Stiles |
Inversion disrupts both configural and featural face processing equally |
| 156 |
Busigny, Joubert, Felician, & Rossion |
Processing upright and inverted faces in acquired prosopagnosic patients with no object recognition deficits |
| 157 |
Rossion & Boremanse |
Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion |
| 158 |
Wilson, Daar, Mohsenzadeh, & Wilkinson |
Independent discrimination of left/right and up/down head orientations |
| 159 |
Natu, Jiang, Narvekar, Keshvari, & O'Toole |
Representations of facial identity over changes in viewpoint |
| 160 |
Nishimura, Joglekar, & Maurer |
The effect of training on the recognition of faces across changes in viewpoint |
| 161 |
Weidenbacher & Neumann |
The first spike counts: A model for STDP learning pose specific representations for estimating view direction |
| 162 |
Davies-Thompson, Spyrou, & Andrews |
View-dependent adaptation to familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human brain |
| 163 |
McKone & Yovel |
A single holistic representation of spacing and feature shape in faces |
| 164 |
Chen & Tseng |
The role of external head contours in face processing in the human occipitotemporal cortex |
| 165 |
Rhodes, Michie, Hughes, & Byatt |
The Fusiform Face Area spontaneously codes spatial relations in faces |
| Multisensory Processing: Low Level |
166 |
Teng & Whitney |
Position discrimination of auditory stimuli in early visual cortex |
| 167 |
Tanaka, Nogai, & Munetsuna |
The locus of auditory-visual integration in the human brain |
| 168 |
Arnott, Cant, Dutton, Munhall, & Goodale |
Auditory-visual interactions in a patient with bilateral occipital lobe lesions |
| 169 |
Leung, Kim, Grabowecky, Paller, & Suzuki |
Cross-modal selective attention effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) |
| 170 |
Leone & McCourt |
Audiovisual multisensory facilitation: A fresh look at neural coactivation and inverse effectiveness |
| 171 |
Wozny, Seitz, & Shams |
Learning associations between simple visual and auditory features |
| 172 |
Matsumiya & Shioiri |
Haptic movements enhance visual motion aftereffect |
| 173 |
Gori, Sandini, & Burr |
Visual, tactile and visuo-tactile motion discrimination |
| 174 |
Vroomen & Keetels |
A sound can change four-dot masking |
| 175 |
Yeh, Chiu, & Hsiao |
The Gestaltist's error revisited with sound |
| 176 |
Yokosawa & Era |
Visual cue influence on three-dimensional haptic angle discrimination |
| Faces: Learning and Expertise |
177 |
Schneider, Harman-James, Wyatte, & Busey |
A noise x inversion paradigm reveals the nature of fingerprint expertise for latent print examiners in EEG and fMRI |
| 178 |
Busey, Schneider, & Wyatte |
Expertise and the width of the visual filter in fingerprint examiners |
| 179 |
Harel & Bentin |
Are all types of expertise created equal? Effects of expertise on categorization and spatial frequency usage |
| 180 |
Williams & Gauthier |
Can expertise explain why face perception is sensitive to spatial frequency content? |
| 181 |
de Heering & Rossion |
Prolonged visual experience in adulthood modulates perceptual face processes |
| 182 |
Luedeman & Nakayama |
Transferring localized facial learning across all of face space |
| 183 |
Chatterjee, Luedeman, & Nakayama |
A test to explore the learning of multiple novel faces |
| 184 |
DeGutis, Robertson, Nakayama, McGlinchey, & Milberg |
Learning faces: Plasticity and the rehabilitation of congenital prosopagnosia |
| 185 |
Hanif, Khalil, Malcolm, & Barton |
Predicting perceptual expertise from semantic knowledge: An indexed car test for prosopagnosic patients |
| Faces: Lifespan Development |
186 |
Nakato, Otsuka, Yamaguchi, & Kakigi |
Perception of mother's face using near-infrared spectroscopy |
| 187 |
Jeffery & Rhodes |
Aftereffects reveal enhanced face-coding plasticity in young children |
| 188 |
Kelly & Steeves |
The effects of losing an eye early in life on face and emotional expression processing |
| 189 |
Mondloch, Robbins, & Maurer |
A feature story: Similarities among adults, 10-year-olds and cataract-reversal patients in face discrimination |
| 190 |
Anzures, Ge, Zhe, Kelly, Pascalis, Quinn, Slater, & Lee |
Face feature processing in children: What develops and what does not? |
| 191 |
Von Der Heide, Wenger, Gilmore, Howarth, Sullivan, & Bittner |
Age-related differences in processing capacity for faces |
| 192 |
Crookes & McKone |
Childhood improvements in face performance result from general cognitive development not changes in face perception: Evidence from faces versus objects, inversion and implicit memory |
| 193 |
Karen & Vanitha |
Face inversion effects in infants are driven more by high, than low, spatial frequencies |
| 194 |
Shroff, Kim, Hefets, & Gerhardstein |
Children's sensitivity to configural cues in faces undergoing rotational motion |
| 195 |
Farzin, Rivera, & Whitney |
Holistic face processing in infants using mooney faces |
| 196 |
Murray, Ruffman, & Halberstadt |
Age-related changes in face processing |
| Visual Working Memory 1 |
197 |
Halko, Lymberis, & Somers |
Interactions between visual short term memory and visuospatial attention |
| 198 |
Huth, Wilimzig, Zinn, & Koch |
The indirect role of saliency in selection for short-term visual memory |
| 199 |
Brady, Konkle, Alvarez, & Oliva |
Compression in visual short-term memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations |
| 200 |
Johnson & Spencer |
Metric-dependent repulsion between colors in visual working memory |
| 201 |
Williams & Woodman |
Directed forgetting versus directed remembering in visual working memory |
| 202 |
Yamaguchi, Tuerk, & Feigenson |
Heterogeneous object arrays increase working memory capacity in 7-month old infants |
| 203 |
Sanocki & Sulman |
Visual short term memory for location: Does objecthood matter? |
| 204 |
Richard & Hollingworth |
Strategic control of visual short-term memory during scene viewing |
| 205 |
Tsubomi, Kondo, & Watanabe |
Common capacity limit for visual perception and working memory |
| 206 |
Lin & Sperling |
No iconic memory decay nor visual short-term memory decay for grating contrast |
| 207 |
Most, Wang, Engelhardt, & Curby |
Selective effects of emotion on visual short-term memory consolidation |
| 208 |
Ko & Seiffert |
Updating objects in visual short-term memory |
| 209 |
Umemoto, Scolari, Vogel, & Awh |
Implicit knowledge biases encoding into visual working memory |
| 210 |
Zhang & Luck |
Sudden death for overtime memories |
| 211 |
Rasmussen & Hollingworth |
The capacity for spatial updating in visual short-term memory |
| 212 |
Sligte, Scholte, & Lamme |
Activation in V4 predicts fragile or durable storage in visual working memory |
| 213 |
Fiser, Orban, & Lengyel |
Linking implicit chunk learning and the capacity of working memory |
| Eye Movements and Perception |
214 |
Martinez-Conde, Troncoso, & Macknik |
Microsaccades counteract perceptual filling-in |
| 215 |
Phillips, Steenrod, & Goldberg |
Saccade adaptation in monkeys is object-specific |
| 216 |
Leek & Johnston |
Fixation locations during three-dimensional object recognition are predicted by image segmentation points at concave surface intersections |
| 217 |
Richard, Churan, Guitton, & Pack |
Perceptual compression during head-free gaze shifts: visual and extraretinal contributions |
| 218 |
Schütz, Braun, Kerzel, & Gegenfurtner |
Improved visual sensitivity during smooth pursuit eye movements |
| 219 |
Sharan, Rosenholtz, & Adelson |
Eye movements for shape and material perception |
| Multiple Object Tracking 1 |
220 |
Howe, Livingstone, Morocz, Horowitz, & Wolfe |
A Neurophysiological model of multiple object tracking derived from fMRI |
| 221 |
Scalf & Beck |
Attentional capacity is limited by the functional architecture of visual cortex: competition for representation impedes attention to multiple items |
| 222 |
McCollough, Drew, Horowitz, & Vogel |
Probing the allocation of attention during multiple object tracking with ERPs |
| 223 |
Flombaum & Scholl |
How does attention operate during multiple object tracking?: Evidence from the 'slot-machine' task for parallel access to target features |
| 224 |
Awh, Scolari, & Ishikawa |
Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting |
| 225 |
Jiang, Vázquez, & Makovski |
Visual learning in multiple object tracking |
| Cortical Processing |
226 |
Chavane, Reynaud, & Masson |
The role of cortico-cortical interactions during motion integration: a voltage-sensitive dye imaging study in V1 and V2 of the awake monkey |
| 227 |
Tanigawa, Lu, Chen, & Roe |
Functional subdivisions in macaque V4 revealed by optical imaging in the behaving Macaque monkey |
| 228 |
Schmid, Mechler, Ohiorhenuan, Purpura, & Victor |
Processing of orientation discontinuities in space and time in V1 and V2 |
| 229 |
Kumbhani, El-Shamayleh, & Movshon |
Spatial and temporal limits of pattern motion analysis by mt neurons |
| 230 |
Hussar, Lui, & Pasternak |
Representation of stimulus speed in prefrontal cortex during speed discrimination task |
| 231 |
Cassanello, Nihalani, & Ferrera |
The role of the frontal eye fields in velocity compensation during saccades to moving targets |
| 232 |
Vangeneugden, Pollick, & Vogels |
Functional differentiation of macaque visual temporal cortical neurons using a parameterized action space |
| Attention: Divided Attention |
233 |
Horowitz, Wolfe, Cohen, Czeisler, & Klerman |
Quantifying the effects of sleepiness on sustained visual attention |
| 234 |
Halberda, Hunter, Pietroski, & Lidz |
An interface between language and vision: Quantifier words and set-based processing |
| 235 |
Lleras, Ahn, Levinthal, & Beck |
Neural correlates of inhibition to individual members of complex visual categories that have been recently rejected as distracting |
| 236 |
van Gaal, Ridderinkhof, Fahrenfort, & Lamme |
Unconsciously triggered inhibitory control is associated with frontal brain potentials |
| 237 |
Carter, Luedeman, Mitroff, & Nakayama |
Motion induced blindness: The more you attend the less you see |
| 238 |
Motoyoshi & Hayakawa |
Adaptation-induced blindness |
| 239 |
Kelley & Lavie |
Attentional learning: The role of distractor expectancy |
| Binocular Rivalry and Integration 1 |
240 |
Kang & Shevell |
The stabilization of a binocular percept during intermittent presentation |
| 241 |
Maehara, Huang, & Hess |
The importance of static phase-aligned, high spatial frequency components for continuous flash suppression |
| 242 |
Su, Ooi, & He |
Incompatible local features are unnecessary for binocular suppression |
| 243 |
Reavis, Afraz, & Nakayama |
Faces are privileged stimuli: The effect of stimulus characteristics on continuous flash suppression |
| 244 |
Zhang & He |
Voluntary attention can modulate eye-specific neural signals prior to the site of interocular competition |
| 245 |
St.Clair, Hong, & Shevell |
Misbinding of color to form in afterimages follows from a persisting binocular neural representation |
| 246 |
Ling & Blake |
Suppression during binocular rivalry broadens orientation tuning |
| 247 |
Alais, Apthorp, & Wenderoth |
Binocular rivalry between fast 'streaky' motions deeply suppresses static orientation probes: Evidence for motion streaks |
| 248 |
Breitmeyer, Pham, & Sheth |
How emotional arousal and affect influence access to visual awareness |
| 249 |
Kimura, Abe, & Goryo |
Pupillary response to grating patterns during permanent suppression |
| 250 |
Abe, Kimura, & Goryo |
Integration of color and pattern investigated with visibility modulation of chromatic gratings |
| 251 |
Lerner, Fukui, & Rubin |
Bi-stable perception and neural competition at equi-dominance and away from it |
| 252 |
Jackson, Brady, & Cummins |
Rotating walker: An ambiguous biological stimulus reveals biases in human vision |
| 253 |
Lamirel, Hupé, & Lorenceau |
Pupil dynamics during bistable form/motion binding |
| 254 |
Knapen, Pearson, Brascamp, van Ee, & Blake |
The role of frontal areas in alternations during perceptual bistability |
| 255 |
Chien, Chen, & Chen |
Can noises defeat will power in Necker cube reversals? Equating top-down influence with bottom-up bias with a noise paradigm |
| Faces: Other-race Effects |
256 |
O'Toole, Phillips, Narvekar, Jiang, & Ayyad |
Face recognition algorithms and the "other-race" effect |
| 257 |
Zhang, Ge, Wang, Kelly, Quinn, Slater, Pascalis, & Lee |
Two faces of the other-race effect: Recognition and categorization of Caucasians and Chinese Faces |
| 258 |
Fiset, Blais, Gosselin, Bub, & Tanaka |
Potent features for the categorization of Caucasian, African American, and Asian faces in Caucasian observers |
| 259 |
Lebrecht, Pierce, Tanaka, & Tarr |
Seeing beyond faces: The social significance of being an other-race expert |
| 260 |
Elms, Mondloch, Maurer, Hayward, Rhodes, Tanaka, & Zhou |
Other-race faces: Limitations of expert face processing |
| 261 |
Jaquet, Rhodes, & Hayward |
It's more than just physical: The contribution of social category information to race-selective face aftereffects |
| 262 |
Buttle & East |
Traditional facial tattoos disrupt face recognition processes |
| Spatial Vision: Mechanisms 1 |
263 |
Zlotnik, Ben Yaish, Yehezkel, Belkin, & Zalevsky |
Thin films as spectacles and contact lenses for aberration-corrected vision via brain adaptation to contrast |
| 264 |
Kubilius, Dilks, Baker, & Kanwisher |
The visual phantom illusion originates in "higher" cortical areas, not V1 |
| 265 |
Wolfson, Graham, & Pan |
Two contrast-adaptation processes: One old, one new |
| 266 |
Foley & Abbey |
Contrast discrimination in noise and classification images |
| 267 |
Kies & Chubb |
Perturbation analysis of perceptual templates |
| 268 |
Hairol & Waugh |
Cross-talk between luminance-defined and contrast-defined detection processing revealed by asymmetric lateral spatial interactions |
| 269 |
Waugh & Hairol |
Detecting overlapping luminance-defined and contrast-defined stimuli: Cue combination for better detection? |
| 270 |
Tomassini, Solomon, & Morgan |
When noisy means cardinal: visual biases for cardinal orientations revealed by degrading stimulus identity |
| 271 |
Mineault & Pack |
Getting the most out of classification images |
| 272 |
Huang & Hess |
Dynamics of collinear facilitation: Fast yet sustained |
| 273 |
Jeon, Lu, & Dosher |
Characterizing joint feature and contrast sensitivity of human observers |
| 274 |
Katkov & Sagi |
Lateral facilitation is largely due to internal response enhancement |
| 275 |
Kramer & Olzak |
The absence of a collinearity effect in second-order, contrast-modulation discrimination tasks |
| 276 |
Kim, Haun, & Essock |
The effect of sustained/transient temporal modulation on the horizontal effect of contrast masking |
| 277 |
Lev & Polat |
Filling-in in the periphery indicates that the collinear facilitation is similar to the fovea |
| 278 |
Levine, McAnany, & Anderson |
The effect of curvature on the grid illusions: Influence of a homunculus? |
| 279 |
Olzak & Hibbeler |
Second-order mechanisms do not process contrast-modulated orientation information optimally |
| 280 |
Poletti & Rucci |
Fixational eye movements and retinal activity during a single visual fixation |
| 281 |
Rosenberg, Husson, Mallik, & Issa |
Frequency-doubling in the early visual system underlies sensitivity to second-order stimuli |
| 282 |
Rubin, Chubb, Wright, Wong, & Sperling |
Spatiotemporal dynamics of the perception of dot displays |
| Lightness, Brightness and Luminance |
283 |
Allred, Lohnas, & Brainard |
Bayesian model of the staircase Gelb effect |
| 284 |
Anderson, de Silva, & Whitbread |
Lightness perception has no anchor |
| 285 |
Blakeslee, Reetz, & McCourt |
Spatial filtering versus anchoring accounts of brightness in staircase and simultaneous brightness contrast stimuli |
| 286 |
Radonjić, Escobar, Ivory, & Gilchrist |
The role of articulation and proximity in the effect of depth on lightness |
| 287 |
Rudd |
Ilumination frameworks, selective attention, and edge integration in lightness perception |
| 288 |
Shapiro, Knight, & Lu |
Spatial scale models of lightness illusions: contrast, anchoring, and tunable filters |
| 289 |
Gerhard & Maloney |
Albedo perturbation detection under illumination transformations: A dynamic analogue of lightness constancy |
| 290 |
Poirier, Gosselin, & Arguin |
Seeing through white clouds: When local occlusion cues fail |
| 291 |
McCourt & Blakeslee |
Coming to terms with lightness and brightness: effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments |
| 292 |
Vladusich |
Brightness, darkness and the perception of surface material |
| 293 |
Robinson & de Sa |
Measuring brightness induction during brief stimulus displays |
| 294 |
Horiguchi, Nakadomari, Furuta, Masuda, Asakawa, Koike, Kan, Misaki, Miyauchi, & Wandell |
The balance between transient and sustained temporal response varies across the V1 visual field map |
| 295 |
Heitz, Woodman, Pouget, Cohen, & Schall |
Effects of luminance contrast on visual responses in frontal eye field |
| Perception and Action: Reaching and Grasping |
296 |
Christopoulos & Schrater |
Identifying strategies for grasping objects with position uncertainty using empirical cost-to-go functions |
| 297 |
Watt, Keefe, & Hibbard |
Visual uncertainty predicts grasping when monocular cues are removed but not when binocular cues are removed |
| 298 |
Franz & Bruno |
Visually guided grasping and the Müller-Lyer illusion: As for pointing, the data look contradictory but in fact they are not |
| 299 |
Desanghere & Marotta |
Gaze strategies while grasping: What are you looking at?! |
| 300 |
Hesse & Franz |
Adaptive grasping: Corrective processes after perturbations of object size |
| 301 |
Mon-Williams & Bingham |
Calibration of grasp orientation (and 'wiggle-room' for errors in object orientation perception) |
| 302 |
Keefe, Elsby, & Watt |
Visually guided grasping: Using a small stimulus set can lead to overestimation of the effectiveness of depth cues |
| 303 |
Gonzalez, Brown, & Goodale |
No visual field advantage for visually-guided grasping movements made with the left hand |
| 304 |
Charles, Kent, Jansson, & Mon-Williams |
Visible surface area and prehension movement patterns |
| 305 |
Harvey, Muir, Reeves, Duncan, Livingstone, Jackson, Castle, & Rossit |
Pointing and bisection in open and closed loop reaching in patients with hemispatial neglect |
| 306 |
Issen & Knill |
The weight to spatial memory in visually-guided reaching increases with retinal eccentricity |
| 307 |
Bulakowski, Post, & Whitney |
Differential spatial integration for perception and action revealed by perceptual and visuomotor crowding |
| 308 |
Neva, Siegel, & Henriques |
Equivalent visuomotor adaptation for variable reach practice |
| 309 |
Anderson & Bingham |
Visually guided reaching using proportional rate control of disparity tau: Data and model |
| Search 1 |
310 |
Pedersini, Van Wert, Horowitz, & Wolfe |
Monetary reward does not cure the prevalence effect in a baggage-screening task |
| 311 |
Kunar, Flusberg, & Wolfe |
Why don't people use memory when repeatedly searching though an over-learned visual display? |
| 312 |
Van Wert, Nova, Horowitz, & Wolfe |
What does performance on one visual search task tell you about performance on another? |
| 313 |
Fleck & Mitroff |
Videogamers excel at finding rare targets |
| 314 |
Gao, Newman, & Scholl |
The psychophysics of chasing |
| 315 |
Williams, Pollatsek, Cave, & Stroud |
More than just finding color: Strategy in global visual search is shaped by learned target probabilities |
| 316 |
Yang, Oh, Leung, & Zelinsky |
An effect of WM load on visual search guidance: Evidence from eye movements and functional brain imaging |
| 317 |
Schmidt & Zelinsky |
Visual search guidance increases with a delay between target cue and search |
| 318 |
Lanagan-Leitzel & Moore |
Novice and expert performance on a computerized lifeguarding task |
| 319 |
Godwin, Menneer, Cave, Helman, Way, & Donnelly |
Don't distract the searcher: search performance for X-ray security screening images is reduced with the addition of a simple mental arithmetic task |
| 320 |
Droll & Eckstein |
Expected object position of two hundred fifty observers predicts first fixations of seventy seven separate observers during search |
| 321 |
Gaid, Mills, & Wilcox |
The role of meaning in visual search |